In what scenario might a court appointed guardian be considered a universal agent?

A court-appointed guardian is considered a universal agent when they possess the authority to make all decisions regarding both the personal care and the financial matters of the individual they are appointed to protect. This broad scope of power enables the guardian to act in the best interest of the individual in multiple capacities, thereby encompassing all aspects of their life. Universal agents have the ability to handle significant responsibilities, including healthcare decisions, managing assets, and making legal decisions, reflecting a comprehensive fiduciary role.

In contrast, other scenarios where the authority is limited—such as managing only financial assets, being restricted to property transactions, or negotiating contracts—would not qualify as universal agency because they do not encompass the full range of personal and financial decision-making responsibilities entrusted to a guardian. Each of these limitations suggests a narrower focus and, thus, a more limited agency role.